I Was A Teenage… Blog!

Is there a way to say “Hasta la vista, baby” in Vietnamese?

Posted in Uncategorized by Con/Safos on the October 23rd, 2006

Say Juump! Down on Jump Street! 

I’ve been sitting on this for a week because the tack just wasn’t that sharp.  But now, I’m getting a pain in my ass. 

Tan-ning can be hazardous.   I thought that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 protects citizens who freely exercise their right to vote, even those immigrants who are legal and now naturalized.  

I know that many who saw the immigration rallies this summer were a little panicked and not just because they couldn’t find a decent busboy in their favorite restaurant.   I can’t even begin to fathom all those people (the legal ones, since they’re the only ones that count, right) showing up to the polls.    Said Strom Thurman’s white-sheeted ghost, “Christ, what’s gonna happen when these beaners actually become naturalized citizens and actually exercise their rights to vote?  This could be catastrophic, especially since no one else is showing up to vote.” I keep waiting for the letter from Nyguen’s office that gets posted on the doors of all of those evil liberals in the entertainment industry that says they must pay a poll tax before they vote.    Of course it will have to be singed by one of the GOP’s favorite pages, Sum Yung Guy.    Also, will this in any way affect the way Officer Harry Truman Ioki votes?

And I thought voting and race was the kind of thing that only went on in Survivor.  The tribe has spoken?

c/s   

2 Responses to 'Is there a way to say “Hasta la vista, baby” in Vietnamese?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Is there a way to say “Hasta la vista, baby” in Vietnamese?'.

  1. The Dude said,

    on October 27th, 2006 at 2:19 pm

    So you’re saying I should get in good with the Mexicans? I liked the democrats spokesperson that claimed that they never said such things and things were taken out of context or lost in translation, but the investigation was a violation of their freedom of speech. I think he means a violation of their freedom to say things they didn’t say or mean regardless of the conotation or translation of the words they claim to never have actually said. Check the Constitution. It’s in there. Also, having an exotic, uh, creature, uh, inside the city, uh, for domestic or recreational, uh, that ain’t legal either.

  2. Con/Safos said,

    on October 30th, 2006 at 6:13 pm

    Ha! Nice marmot.

    c/s

Leave a Reply